English lessons: the changing nature of geography curriculum and assessment in England

Alan Kinder

Abstract


Recent reforms to the national geography curriculum in England have been far reaching. Through “knowledge-led” reforms leading to the creation of a “core knowledge” geography curriculum, policy mak-ers have emphasised both greater rigour and increased curriculum freedom for teachers. As a consequence, the way in which teachers approach geographical knowledge, particularly place knowledge, is under re-examination. At the same time, the removal of a nationally-agreed set of progression statements means that standards for 5-14 year olds have effectively become a local matter. The English experience therefore pre-sents us with an opportunity to trace broad and international ideas in education, such as the “knowledge turn”, on national policies and subsequently on the pedagogy and assessment enacted by geography teach-ers.

References


Aston R. and Renshaw S., “Planning a new key stage 3”, Teaching Geography, 39, 2, 2014, p. 645.

Boardman D., “Designing new courses”, Teaching Geography, 20, 2, 1995, p. 56.

Cook K., “Planning a new key stage 3”, Teaching Geography, 39, 1, 2014, pp. 16-17.

DfE, “The importance of teaching”, 2010, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/17542 9/CM-7980.pdf.

DfE, “Statutory guidance – National cur-riculum in England: geography pro-grammes of study”, 2013, https://www. gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-geography-pro-grammes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-geography-programmes-of-study.

DfE, “National curriculum in England: framework for key stages 1 to 4”, 2014, Paragraph 3.1, https://www.gov.uk/govern-ment/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4/the-national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4.

GA, “A different view: a manifesto from the Geographical Association”, 2009, http: //www.geography.org.uk/resources/adifferentview/.

GA, “An assessment and progression framework for geography”, 2014, http://www.geography.org.uk/download/GA%20Asses-sment%204pp%20flyer-3.pdf.

GA, “2014 National Curriculum”, 2015, http://www.geography.org.uk/news/2014nationalcurriculum.

Gove M., “Why there has never been a better time to be a teacher”, 2013, http:// www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-speaks-about-the-importan-ce-of-teaching.

Harris T., “Stakes and ladders”, Teaching Geography, 40, 1, 2015, pp. 14-16.

HM Government, “Education Act 2011”, 2011, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uk-pga/2011/21/pdfs/ukpga_20110021_en.pdf.

Hopkin J., “Level descriptions and as-sessment in geography: a GA discussion

paper”, 2006, http://www.geography.org. uk/download/GA_AULevelAssessmentsInGeography.pdf.

Hopkin J., “Sampling the world”, Teach-ing Geography, 36, 3, 2011, pp. 96-97.

Hopkin J., “Framing the geography nation-al curriculum”, Geography, 98, 2, 2013a, pp. 60-62.

Hopkin J., “What is Key Stage 3 for?”, in Lambert D. and Jones M. (Eds.), Debates in geography education, London, Rout-ledge, 2013b, pp. 29-43.

Kinder A., “Geographical Association cur-riculum consultation feedback report”, 2012, http://www.geography.org.uk/download/GA_GINNCConsultationFeedbackReport.pdf.

Kinder A., “Keeping up with curriculum change”, Teaching Geography, 38, 2, 2013a, pp. 56-59.

Kinder A., “Geography from 2014: back to the future”, Teaching Geography, 38, 3, 2013b, pp. 98-101.

Kinder A. and Lambert D., “The National Curriculum Review: what geography should we teach?”, Teaching Geography, 36, 3, 2011, pp. 93-95.

Lambert D., Hopkin J. and Kinder A., “Thinking geographically”, 2012, http:// www.geography.org.uk/download/GA_GINCConsultation%20ThinkingGeographi-cally%20NC%202012.pdf.

Larkin M and Goldup G., “Planning a new key stage 3”, Teaching Geography, 39, 1,

, p. 18.

Martin F., “Interpreting and implementing the 2014 National Curriculum”, Teaching Geography, 39, 1, 2014, pp. 14-15.

May C., “Planning a new key stage 3”, Teaching geography, 39, 3, 2014, pp. 99-101.

Mitchell D., “What controls the ‘real’ cur-riculum?”, Teaching Geography, 38, 2, 2013, pp. 60-62.

Morgan J., “Knowledge and the school curriculum: a rough guide for teachers”, Teaching Geography, 36, 3, 2011, pp. 90-92.

Oates T., “Could do better: Using interna-tional comparisons to refine the National Curriculum in England”, 2010, http:// www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/images/112281-could-do-better-using-internatio-nal-comparisons-to-refine-the-national-curriculum-in-england.pdf.

Ofsted, “Geography. Learning to make a world of difference”, 2011, http://www. geography.org.uk/download/Ofsted%20 report%2020geography%20learning%20 to%20make%20a%20world%20of%20difference%20(2011).pdf.

Rawling E., “What’s new?”, Teaching Ge-ography, 20, 2, 1995, pp. 59-61.

Rawling E., “Planning your Key Stage 3 curriculum”, Teaching Geography, 33, 3, 2008.

Weeden P. and Hopkin J., “Assessing without levels”, Teaching Geography, 39, 2, 2014, pp. 60-63.

Westaway J. and Rawling E., “Curriculum 2000 in England: one year on”, Teaching Geography, 27, 1, 2002, pp. 9-11.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Sponsoring Organizations:


Sapienza Università di Roma University of Helsinki Università di Torino Western Michigan University

EUGEOIRPPS


With the support of:


ESA

Publisher:
Edizioni Nuova Cultura

 

Online ISSN: 2281 - 5694 Print ISSN: 2281 – 4310 © 2013 - Edizioni Nuova Cultura