Escaping from the visual: story of a failed Participatory Video experience in rural Tanzania

Authors

  • Caterina Pozzobon Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Polytechnic of Turin and University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Abstract

This paper reflects on the limitations of participatory video (PV) starting from a failed implementation of this method during fieldwork for my doctoral dissertation on gendered community water management in two rural villages in central Tanzania that spanned from April to December 2022. The initial eagerness of the participants to take part in the collaborative video turned into an escape from the visual, and the promises contained in a range of debates on the use of PV did not hold. Participant engagement, community empowerment, inclusion of marginalised viewpoints, and the transformative potential of PV struggled to perform in this case study. Eventually, the use of video stood in the way and emptied the participatory process of its ability to release its transformative potential. Moreover, the complexities of my positioning in the field, oscillating between different perceived roles, influenced the PV process and played a role in people’s gradual withdrawal from the visual. These are the themes around which this paper revolves, with the aim of contributing to the body of literature reflecting on knowledge co-production in contexts characterised by unavoidable and systemic imbalances and barriers.

References

Barreteau O., Bots P.W.G. and Daniell K.A., “A Framework for Clarifying ‘Participation’ in Participatory Research to Prevent its Rejection for the Wrong Reasons”, Ecology and Society, 15, 2, 2012.

Batallan G., Dente L. and Ritta L., “Anthropology, participation, and the democratization of knowledge: participatory research using video with youth living in extreme poverty”, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30, 5, 2017, pp. 464-473.

Bery R., “Participatory Video that Empowers”, in White S.A. (Ed.), Participatory Video: Images that Transform and Empower, London, Sage, 2003, pp. 102-121.

Braden S., “Using Video for Research and Representation: Basic Human Needs and Critical Pedagogy”, Journal of Educational Media, 24, 2, 1999, pp. 117-129.

Buckingham D., “‘Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals”, Media, Culture and Society, 31, 4, 2009, pp. 633-652.

Caretta M.A., “Situated knowledge in crosscultural, cross-language research: a collaborative reflexive analysis of researcher, assistant and participant subjectivities”, Qualitative research, 2014, pp. 1-17.

Chiu L.F., “Culturally Competent Health Promotion: The Potentiail of Participatory Video for Empowering Migrant and Minority Ethnic Communities”, International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care, 5, 1, 2009, pp. 5-14.

de Lange N. and Mitchell C., “Building sustainability into Work with Participatory Video”, in Milne E., Mitchell C. and de Lange N. (Eds.), Handbook of Participatory Video, Lanham, AltaMira Press, 2012, pp. 310-330.

Duncombe J. and Jessop J., “‘Doing rapport’ and the ethics of ‘faking friendship’”, in Miller T., Birch M., Mauthner M. and Jessop J. (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research, SAGE Publications Ltd, 2012.

Edmondson L., “‘Saving Whiteface’ in Tanzania: Intercultural Discomforts”, Theatre Topics, 9, 1, 1999, pp. 31-49.

Gaventa J. and Cornwall A., “Challenging the Boundiaries of the Possible: Participation, Knowledge and Power”, IDS Bulletin, Issue 6, 2006, pp. 122-128.

High C., Singh C., Petheram L. and Nemes G., “Defining participatory video for practice”, in Milne E., Mitchell C. and de Lange N. (Eds.), Handbook of Participatory Video, Lanham, AltaMira Press, 2012, pp. 35-48.

Jenkins H. and Carpentier N., “Theorizing participatory intensities: A conversion about participation and politics”, Convergence; The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19, 3, 2013, pp. 265-286.

Jenkins K., Romero H. and Videla Oyarzo A., “Reflections on a failed participatory workshop in Northern Chile: Negotiating boycotts, benefits, and the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous people”, Emotion, Space and Society, 37, 2020.

Jiang Z. and Kobylinska T., “Art with marginalised communities: Participatory video as a tool of empowerment and resistance for migrant domestic workers in London”, City, 24, 1-2, 2020, pp. 348-363.

Jupp E., “Participation, local knoeledge and empowerment: Researching public space with young people”, Environment and Planning A, Volume 39, 2007, pp. 2832-2844.

Low B., Brushwood Rose C., Salvio P.M. and Palacios L., “(Re)framing the Scholarship on Partecipatory Video”, in Milne E., Mitchell C. and de Lange N. (Eds.), Handbook of Participatory Video, Lanham, AltaMira Press, 2012, pp. 49-64.

Macfarlane B., “Methodology, Fake Learning, and Emotional Performativity”, ECNU Review of Education, 5, 1, 2022, pp. 140-155.

Milne E.J., “Saying ‘No’ to Participatory Video”, in Milne E., Mitchell C. and de Lange N. (Eds.), Handbook of Participatory Video, Lanham, AltaMira Press, 2012, pp. 257-268.

Mistry J., Bignante E. and Berardi A., “Why are we doing it? Exploring participant motivations within a participatory video project”, Area, 48, 4, 2016, pp. 412-418.

Mistry J. and Shaw J., “Evolving Social and Political Dialogue through Participatory Video Processes”, Progress in Development Studies, 21, 2, 2021, pp. 196-213.

Oyěwumi O., “Visualizing the body: Western Theories and African Subjects”, in Oyěwumi O (Ed.), African Gender Studies – A Reader, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 3-22.

Rose G., “Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics”, Progress in Human Geography, 21, 3, 1997, pp. 305-320.

Rose G., “On the Need to Ask How, Exactly, Is Geography ‘Visual’?”, Antipode, 35, 2, 2003, pp. 212-21.

Russell L., “Visual methods in researching the arts and inclusion: possibilities and diilemmas”, Ethnography and Education, 2, 1, 2007, pp. 39-55.

Shrum W., Duque R. and Brown T., “Digital video as research practice: Methodology for the millennium”, Journal of Research Practice, 1, 1, 2005, Article M4.

Sultana F., “Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research”, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6, 3, 2007, pp. 374-385.

Takeda Y., “Toward ‘more participatory’ participatory video: A thematic review of literature”, Learning, Media and Technology, 46, 4, 2021, pp. 451-464.

Tolia-Kelly D.P., “The geographies of cultural geography II: Visual culture”, Progress in Human Geography, 36, 1, 2012, pp. 135-142.

Walker G. and Arrighi J., “Participatory Video as a Catalyst for Informal Learning and Expression: A Review of a PV Training in Uganda 2012”, LEARNing Landscapes, 6, 2, 2013, pp. 409-423.

Welsh S., “Challenging Knowledge Production with Participatory Video”, in Milne E., Mitchell C. and De Lange N. (Eds.), Handbook of Participatory Video, AltaMira Press, 2012, pp. 242-256.

White S.A., “Participatory Video: A process that Transforms the Self and the Other”, in White S.A. (Ed.), Participatory VIdeo: Images that Transform and Empower, London, Sage, 2003, pp. 63-101.

Young L. and Barrett H., “Adapting visual methods: action research with Kampala street children”, Area, 33, 2, 2001, pp. 141-152.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

Issue

Vol. 1 (2023)

Section

The language of images (edited by Elisa Bignante and Marco Maggioli)

License

The Author assigns to the Nuova Cultura and to Italian Association of Geography Teachers all rights under copyright that can exist in and to the submitted paper. The Author warrants that the paper and images (photos, maps, graphs etc.) are original and that he/she is the Author of the submitted contribution and its parts; in the case of images taken by other publications, the Author must provide a specific authorization and must pay in advance any copyright.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.